lørdag 2. mai 2020

Why nuclear energy is over.




«To produce the 25 tonnes or so of uranium fuel needed to keep your average reactor going for a year entails the extraction of half a million tonnes of waste rock and over 100,000 tonnes of mill tailings. These are toxic for hundreds of thousands of years. The conversion plant will generate another 144 tonnes of solid waste and 1343 cubic metres of liquid waste.

Contamination of local water supplies around uranium mines and processing plants has been documented in Brazil, Colorado, Texas, Australia, Namibia and many other sites. To supply even a fraction of the power stations the industry expects to be online worldwide in 2020 would mean generating 50 million tonnes of toxic radioactive residues every single year.»

torsdag 27. februar 2020

Sannheten om folkene bak Facebook-gruppen «Folkeopprøret mot klimahysteriet»



Katta er ute av sekken:

Flere av dem som styrer «Folkeopprøret» er eller har vært aktive i innvandrings- og islamfiendtlige grupper. Der har de kommet med negative karakteristikker av innvandrere og muslimer.

Både grunnlegger Knut Amundsen og administrator Ole Kristian Sivertsen har vært aktive på Facebook-siden til den høyreradikale og islamfiendtlige organisasjonen «Stopp islamiseringen av Norge» (SIAN).

Flere av administratorene og moderatorene har hetset navngitte politikere som Gro Harlem Brundtland (Ap), Erna Solberg (H) og Abid Raja (V).

Noen er aktive i anti-barnevernsgrupper, mens andre bidrar til å spre konspirasjonsteorier om vaksiner.
https://www.faktisk.no/artikler/L2l/innsikt-hvem-styrer-egentlig-folkeopproret-mot-klimahysteriet?fbclid=IwAR2Z015EsGt3X9qhVH4AoPBFGI9LpOzX36zhVoHfYy7b4_a_5ArCBu-qeGc






Mange voksne menn raser i kommentarfeltene, spesielt over innvandring og unge kvinner i maktposisjoner.

"– Ut av dem som ytret seg så stygt at de faktisk ble utestengt vil jeg tippe at minst 9 av 10 var menn over 50 år.

- 9 av 10 av dem som kastes ut av kommentarfeltene er menn over 50 år, sier Øyvind Solstad

For sinte konservative menn er det ikke klimaet som er truet, men en viss type moderne industrisamfunn bygget og dominert av deres form for maskulinitet.

#MeToo-bevegelsen er og en konspirasjon for å angripe mannlig forrang.

Med på lasset har de fått alle konspiratorisk-tenkende som fra før av dyrker andre anti-myndighets-konspirasjonsteorier som chem-trails, anti vaxxing, new world order og barnehjems-konspira osv.

«Folkeopprøret mot klimahysteriet» er sannsynligvis dannet på blind tro og konspirasjonsteorier. Og sinne. Mye sinne. Og hevn.

Det er kanskje ikke så rart. Når man går i Bitcoin-fella:

Ingen bildebeskrivelse er tilgjengelig.







søndag 23. februar 2020

Bots post quarter of climate change tweets

In addition to the charlatans who have abandoned science to become paid propagandists, the illusion of numbers of deniers is being boosted by the use of bots according to this study!

A study by researchers at Brown University has found a quarter of posts about climate change on Twitter were written by bots.

Bots are computer programs that can masquerade as humans to post or send messages on social media.

Researchers discovered tweets posted by bots created the impression there was a high level of climate change denial.

The paper detailing the finds has not yet been published and was first reported by The Guardian newspaper.

The research team analysed 6.5 million tweets from the period surrounding President Donald Trump's June 2017 announcement that he was removing the United States from the Paris climate accord.

The finding showed 25% of tweets on climate change were likely posted by bots. Most of those tweets centred on denials of global warming or rejections of climate science.

Researchers used a tool from Indiana University called Botometer to determine the probability that a tweet was sent by bots or by humans. Within the overarching topic of climate change, they also broke down several subcategories.

Tweets about "fake science" were found to have been written by bots 38% of the time and 28% of tweets about oil company Exxon were posted by bots.

Bots post quarter of climate change tweets

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-51595285

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/feb/21/climate-tweets-twitter-bots-analysis?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other&fbclid=IwAR0vmmuNKDy4CeSfxgH_Zvmfv7yVu2G0TSmIGUpm3biKkEupyCHEOcDrivg

fredag 21. februar 2020

Jet stream not getting 'wavier' despite Arctic warming



"Rapid Arctic warming has not led to a "wavier" jet stream around the mid-latitudes in recent decades, pioneering new research has shown.

Scientists from the University of Exeter have studied the extent to which Arctic amplification—the faster rate of warming in the Arctic compared to places farther south—has affected the fluctuation of the jet stream's winding course over the North Hemisphere.

Recent studies have suggested the warming Arctic region has led to a "wavier" jet stream—which can lead to extreme weather conditions striking the US and Europe.

However, the new study by Dr. Russell Blackport and Professor James Screen, shows that Arctic warming does not drive a more meandering jet stream."

https://phys.org/news/2020-02-jet-stream-wavier-arctic.html?fbclid=IwAR2bkO-dlcCni9p2rp31p56C6E8rlSY6t3nm2RcQP1sgay1TnIS2mEWKv0I

https://climatefeedback.org/evaluation/one-of-the-most-troubling-ideas-about-climate-change-just-found-new-evidence-in-its-favor-chris-mooney-washington-post/

tirsdag 18. februar 2020

fredag 24. januar 2020

HOW THE RICH PLAN TO RULE A BURNING PLANET

HOW THE RICH PLAN TO RULE A BURNING PLANET

"They are like angels of death, happy to watch the world burn, and millions burn with it, if they can preserve for themselves the heavenly realm of a system that has brought them untold riches.

In the face of the climate crisis, the main priority of the global ruling class and its political servants is to batten down the hatches. Publicly, they’re telling school kids not to worry about the future. Behind the scenes, however–in the cabinet offices, boardrooms, mansions and military high commands–they’re hard at work, planning for a future in which they can maintain their power and privilege amid the chaos and destruction of the burning world around them.

We’re not, as some in the environment movement argue, “all in this together”. There are many ways in which the wealthy minority at the top of society are already protected from the worst climate change impacts. Big corporations can afford to spend millions on mitigating climate change risks–ensuring their assets are protected so they can keep their business running even during a major disaster. Businesses and wealthy individuals can also protect themselves by taking out insurance policies that will pay out if their property is damaged in a flood, fire or other climate-related disaster.
The rich are also protected from climate change on a more day to day level. They tend to live in the leafiest suburbs, in large, climate-controlled houses. They have shorter commutes to work, where, again, they’re most often to be found in the most comfortable, air-conditioned buildings. They’re not the ones working on farms or construction sites, in factories or warehouses–struggling with the increasing frequency of summer heatwaves. They’re not the ones living in houses with no air conditioning, sweating their way through stifling summer nights. They have pools and manicured lawns and can afford their own large water tanks to keep their gardens green in the hot, dry summer months."



søndag 12. januar 2020

The socialism claims etc.



Anthropogenic climate change is used to ENLIGHTEN the population about health hazards. And the bigger picture, the dangers of climate changes. Its what governments are supposed to do: protect its citizens from corporate polluters and their poison.

Maybe you rather have corporatism and fascism?

where democracy is replaced

with

corporatism at the expense of public health, enlightenment and freedom where corporations can pummel the public into submission and where governments are divested of the ability to control policy, economy, and ultimately the fate of the nation.


 
Hurry, let's

replace democratic socialism

with a financialised and hypermobile global capital state from a tradition of a privileged, predominantly white and male perspective whose economic identity is intimately intertwined with the most egregious form of predatory capitalism and prosperous circumstances built on the backs of imperialism, colonialism, slavery and white supremacy,

who believes that this prosperity was not only normal, but legitimately earned.

Hurry, let's

take down democracy, science, education and freedom

and replace it with

utopian anarcho-capitalist pseudo-religious fascist anarchist white supremo haven

where we, their disposable work horses, works our arses off for minimum wages before we die bending over for the billionaire oligarchs casual gods.

Hurry. let's be

mesmerised by buffoons who encourage us to channel the anger that should be reserved for billionaires towards immigrants, women, Jews, Muslims, people of colour and other imaginary enemies and customary scapegoats.

Let's become billionaire worshippers, let's become peasants for plutocracy

just so climate deniers, their all swallowing gullible tribe of sheeples, can forget about their over all failure in life, before they realize they've been duped one more -final- time.

"Sold to the public as quasi-scholarly organizations, their real function was to legitimize the right to pollute for oil, gas and coal companies, and to argue for ever more tax cuts for the people who created them.The genius of this strategy is to “turn corporate self-interest into a movement among people on the streets”

Dark Money review: Nazi oil, the Koch brothers and a rightwing revolution

The 20th century will go down as the century when corporate polluters realized, by using billions on disinformation campaigns, they could dupe the public into believing their attacks on science was about the science being wrong, when it really was about them protecting their blood money flow.


If the internet had been around in the 60s and 70s, climate deniers would be arguing against the health effects of smoking, and dredging up historical/anecdotal examples to insist that lung cancer was "natural", while warning that smoking cessation efforts were all part of a global conspiracy of taxation and socio-economic control.

"As early as the 1950s, the groups shared scientists and publicists to downplay dangers of smoking and climate change".


____________________________________________________________________

Where is your critical sense? 

Why do you think the right-wing sources you link to transform all science and news into something comfortable and convenient for corporate polluters and the 1% rich?

Whats in it for you?

Nothing.

You're a tool for people a lot smarter and richer than you.

Its amazing how easy it is to turn ordinary people into billionaire worshippers. And the think tanks brings the gospel. A gospel which is nothing but corporate (polluters) self-interests hidden in a cocktail of emotional catering pandering propaganda aimed at their tribe of low educated wingnut white supremo boys, hillbilly freaks and  bible boys.

It's just like how you would hide your dogs pill, which it hates, in its food.

And then enters their usual suspects, thir tribe of low educated right wing altar boys; the billionaire worshippers:

Billionaire worshipers seek out troll groups where 
billionaires "create jobs" and are "always right" and "saves the world,"and the "the poor," 
while billionaires in reality only wallow in their own self-indulgence, greed, glutton and selfishness.

You are their cannon fodder, a pawn in their game.

__________________________________________________________________

Yes, its all "fake news".

How could the corporate polluters possibly be the bad guys?

How could a tradition built on the backs of imperialism, colonialism, slavery and white supremacy, who believes that this prosperity was not only normal, but legitimately earned, 

be at the "wrong" end of the news?

How could this massive, well-funded effort to preserve corporate wealth and power at the expense of public enlightenment and freedom, be at the "wrong" end of the news?

LOL.

How could trying to replace democracy with corporatism where big companies can pummel the public into submission, be the bad news?

How could anarcho predatory capitalists, billionaire oligarchs and robber barons, who control governments and are not paying taxes, but raking in trillions in corporate socialist subsidies from governments while fear mongering about "global socialism "

be the bad news?

How could taking down democracy, science, education and freedom

and replace it with 

utopian anarcho-capitalist pseudo-religious fascist anarchist white supremo fantasy of escape

where we, 

their disposable work horses, works our arses off for minimum wages before we die bending over for the billionaire oligarchs casual gods. 

be the bad news?

LOL

How can it possibly be "bad news" to become peasants for plutocracy?




























tirsdag 7. januar 2020

Misbruket av Ljungqvists graf





Her kommer Clexit-Geir med løgnene sine som vanlig. DEt gamle trikset med å misrepresentere vitenskap og til og med KLIPPE bort data som ikke passer inn.
Merkelig at du påstar noe annet enn Ljungqvist selv da.
La oss sjekke studien du refererer til.
han skriver:
“Our temperature reconstruction agrees well with the reconstructions by Moberg et al. (2005) and Mann et al. (2008) with regard to the amplitude of the variability as well as the timing of warm and cold periods, except for the period c. AD 300–800, despite significant differences in both data coverage and methodology.”
Videre skriver Ljungqvist:
"Since AD 1990, though, average temperatures in the extra-tropical Northern Hemisphere exceed those of any other warm decades the last two millennia, even the peak of the Medieval Warm Period”
Med andre ord, hans rekonstruksjon er helt i tråd med andres, selv hockeykøllen.
Slik ser hans rekonstruksjon ut, oppdatert:
Jeg har lagt inn en sirkel slik at selv du kan se dagens nivå:

torsdag 26. desember 2019

Australias shameful war on science.



Fossil-fuel industry doubles donations to major parties in four years, report shows

Coal, oil and gas companies trying to ‘buy political power’, says Australian Conservation Foundation

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/feb/12/fossil-fuel-industry-doubles-donations-to-major-parties-in-four-years-report-shows

“Australia has been experiencing warmer, drier conditions lately — a result in part to something called a Positive Indian Ocean Dipole, a phenomenon similar to El Niño.
As a result of westerly winds in the equatorial region weakening, warm water from the deep ocean shifts towards Africa from the Indian Ocean and cool water rises up in the east. For Australia, this temperature difference means drier and hotter weather for much of the continent.

Fingerprints of climate change

However, that's not the only factor. The country has been experiencing long-term drought conditions, even when there isn't a positive dipole. In Eastern Australia, which includes New South Wales, Queensland and Victoria where the fires are the worst, rainfall has been the lowest on record.
New South Wales alone has been the driest on record with rainfall 36 per cent below the 1961–1990 average, according to Australia's weather and climate agency.

The Murray-Darling Basin that stretches from Queensland southwest to South Australia, has experienced the driest 34 months on record, compared to other 34-month records starting in January. Victoria, where a state of disaster was declared, has also had its driest 34 months on record. “

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/31/world/australia/fires-red-skies-Mallacoota.html?fbclid=IwAR18mDsO5Vt4o6nmBBdL1r22hoEs8BsRCfFyc95MUw5fIUkozmyAULt8q00

https://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/australia-bushfires-1.5414325?fbclid=IwAR2AxgyICjGeLxe2b6VySHEt_YFo5OolQ7kKSjH2xzJ6IN8jJH_avZ1trAY

Why are the Australia government doing nothing?

Climate denialism is bought and paid for by a rotten political system - corruption that comes from the dominance of political donations in public life, the lack of transparency around donations, and the way they facilitate the influencing of policy by vested interests. The persistence of climate denialism in Australian politics reflects the wealth of mining and energy companies prepared to use a deeply flawed political system to wield power.

https://www.crikey.com.au/2019/11/18/climate-denialism-rotten-political-system/?utm_campaign=Weekender&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&wkndr=S2FjbnI2MHlOSEJobXh5eEVDdUpCQT09

Australia has become the complacent country. Complacent about its future economic competitiveness. Complacent about climate change. Complacent about how to navigate our future in the region given China’s rise, America’s response and a neighbourhood increasingly torn between the two. Complacent too about the gradual erosion of our democracy itself through a growing “pay for play” culture from financial donations to political parties, an increasing assault on the independence of the public service and the abuse of monopolistic media power.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/sep/06/democracy-overboard-rupert-murdochs-long-war-on-australian-politics?CMP=share_btn_fb&fbclid=IwAR0Xq-BviEZHVjn5bdyHJ-pwOJG9QOJxgYWG_UT3awLICYNEqLkaOtxgkUU

https://www.afr.com/policy/energy-and-climate/the-financial-times-has-published-a-brutal-editorial-about-australia-20191227-p53n41?fbclid=IwAR0oUSZX5N-pweyLmR8Rbdv281nSFX6XCT9kEjCPZiPTHSvKwNR70Z01QdE

https://twitter.com/thejuicemedia/status/1210084754369867776?s=20

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/jul/21/gina-rinehart-company-revealed-as-45m-donor-to-climate-sceptic-thinktank?fbclid=IwAR0v1bB7dMS9owZ_yJn-v2Rtw40ykwp0BwZpEa8iU8rAqRSJzhydfIXqLCg



The coal industry has infiltrated Australia's federal government through a secretive network of ties, working to influence Australia’s political decisions at the highest level: right up to the office of the Prime Minister, Scott Morrison

http://act.greenpeace.org.au/dirtypower






The Peter Ridd nonsense debunked:

“Dr Ridd was not sacked because of his scientific views. Dr Ridd was never gagged or silenced about his scientific views, a matter which was admitted during the court hearing.”

James Cook University professor Peter Ridd's sacking ruled unlawful

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/apr/16/james-cook-university-professor-peter-ridds-sacking-ruled-unlawful

Great Barrier Reef expert panel says Peter Ridd misrepresenting science

Exclusive: Panel head Ian Chubb compares ‘roadshow of Dr Ridd’ to tobacco industry strategy defending smoking

Great Barrier Reef expert panel says Peter Ridd misrepresenting science

State government-funded managers urge cane farmers to question reef science

Exclusive: Speaking tour by controversial academic Peter Ridd is being supported by sugarcane managers paid for with Queensland government funds


https://www.desmogblog.com/2018/03/28/climate-science-deniers-new-hero-peter-ridd-institute-public-affairs

https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2019-04-23/peter-ridd-reef-science-climate-change/11026540

https://www.afr.com/companies/professional-services/could-salvatore-vasta-be-australias-worst-judge-20190225-h1bp1k

He’s true Heartland. We’re trying to track any direct payment by them or other serious breach of contract with JCU. My meeting with the legal team is tomorrow. I’ll give them all the data so far Also trying to find any link between the Vasta family with mafia. Salvatore senior, Angelo who was a disgraced judge and disgraced son Sal jnr who ruled against the university. Sal’s brother is conservative politician appointed in the Tony Abbott era. On lots of parliamentary committees with IPA buddies. It’s incestuous. The appeal brief won’t allow new evidence about Ridd but aim to discredit the judge. 15 appeals overturned since 2015. He was ordered to take time off for counselling about continuing intimidatory tactics in court. That was a couple of months after Ridd’s trial. His grandfather had passed away only a few months prior as well. Gotta get the judge on political bias, history of inappropriate behaviour and rulings, personal issues and no precedent mentioned in his decision

Peter Ridd funded by IPA Rinehart - Murdoch. Ridd’s mentor and colleague was Bob Carter. Both were at my JCU uni during my tenure. Bad boys. Check him out with the law suit against the uni. It’s BS. Court case being paid by a Rinehart and crowd funding . This other guy Cohen is a corrupt mongrel.

Yes and influencing gov policy at the top. Sacked from JCU for academic misconduct. Nothing to do with science but the murdochrisy is all about “freedom of speech” to dissent scientific “opinions.” Ridd slandered his boss Terry Hughes who is a world leading reef biologist. Nothing to do with dissenting speech because the same uni awarded Ridd his professorship despite 20 years of denial. The uni’s appeal against Ridd’s $1.2 million compensation. The judge is Sal Vasta ... appointed to the bench by personal friend George Brandis. He is very close to being disbarred just like papa Angelo Vasta from Jph Bjelke Peterson.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/jul/21/gina-rinehart-company-revealed-as-45m-donor-to-climate-sceptic-thinktank

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_of_Public_Affairs

https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/how-gina-rinehart-bought-the-ipa,11749

_________________

Great Barrier Reef world heritage values damaged by climate change, government admits
Report to Unesco by the federal and Queensland governments says key features have deteriorated since reef was listed in 1981.

Great Barrier Reef world heritage values damaged by climate change, government admits

Real science tells us the Great Barrier Reefs are not in a good condition.

Scientists mobilise as bleaching resumes on Great Barrier Reef

During 2015–2016, record temperatures triggered a pan-tropical episode of coral bleaching, the third global-scale event since mass bleaching was first documented in the 1980s. Here we examine how and why the severity of recurrent major bleaching events has varied at multiple scales, using aerial and underwater surveys of Australian reefs combined with satellite-derived sea surface temperatures. The distinctive geographic footprints of recurrent bleaching on the Great Barrier Reef in 1998, 2002 and 2016 were determined by the spatial pattern of sea temperatures in each year. Water quality and fishing pressure had minimal effect on the unprecedented bleaching in 2016, suggesting that local protection of reefs affords little or no resistance to extreme heat. Similarly, past exposure to bleaching in 1998 and 2002 did not lessen the severity of bleaching in 2016. Consequently, immediate global action to curb future warming is essential to secure a future for coral reefs.
Scientists mobilise as bleaching resumes on Great Barrier Reef

Global warming and recurrent mass bleaching of corals

Key points from the study:
  • 2015-2016 saw record temperatures that triggered a massive episode of coral bleaching across the tropics
  • Coral bleaching events should no longer be thought of as individual disturbances to reefs, but as recurring events that threaten the viability of coral reefs globally
  • The Great Barrier Reef has had three major bleaching episodes, in 1998, 2002 and 2016, with the latest being the most severe and with catastrophic levels of bleaching occurring in the northern third of the Reef (a region approximately 800 km or 500 miles in length)
  • The amount of bleaching on individual reefs in 2016 was tightly linked to local heat exposure
  • The cumulative, superimposed footprint of the three mass bleaching events on the Great Barrier Reef has now encompassed virtually all of the Great Barrier Reef
  • Past exposure to bleaching in 1998 and 2002 did not lessen the severity of the bleaching in 2016
Evidence for ocean acidification in the Great Barrier Reef of Australia.


Ridd was not sacked because of his scientific views. Ridd was never gagged or silenced about his scientific views, a matter which was admitted during the court hearing. “Some have thought that this trial was about freedom of speech and intellectual freedom. Media reports have considered that this trial was about silencing persons with controversial or unpopular views,” Vasta said in his judgement.“Rather, this trial was purely and simply about the proper construction of a clause in an enterprise agreement.”

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/apr/16/james-cook-university-professor-peter-ridds-sacking-ruled-unlawful

Ridd's roadshow is just like how tobacco industry defended smoking. Ridd is the rotten egg the polluter industries always looks for. Someone who is willing to become a marionette for blood money. And now the shameful Denial for profit Movement in Australia have their man. Their puppet. Speaking tour by Peter Ridd is being supported by sugarcane managers paid for with Queensland government funds.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/aug/15/managers-funded-by-queensland-government-grant-urge-cane-farmers-to-question-reef-science 

The judge who ruled for Ridd is as crocked as catholic priests.

https://www.afr.com/companies/professional-services/could-salvatore-vasta-be-australias-worst-judge-20190225-h1bp1k

Ridds claims that the barrier Reef is OK is parotting claims from tobacco industry claiming there was no link between smoking and lung cancer. Most comprehensive study on the Barrier Reef concludes its damaged by CC:

https://www.jcu.edu.au/news/releases/2017/march/scientists-mobilise-as-bleaching-resumes-on-great-barrier-reef

https://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v543/n7645/full/nature21707.html

Other studies find the same conclusion:

http://www.pnas.org/content/109/44/17995

History will punish Ridd and his ilk hard. He sold his soul at the crossroad.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/aug/28/great-barrier-reef-expert-panel-says-peter-ridd-misrepresenting-science

Bonus New Zealand report:

https://www.mfe.govt.nz/sites/default/files/media/media/our-atmosphere-and-climate-2017-final.pdf


mandag 2. desember 2019

Venice are always sinking myth


https://www.comune.venezia.it/it/content/distribuzione-annuale-delle-alte-maree-110-cm




Severe flooding in Venice that has left much of the Italian city under water is a direct result of climate change, the mayor says.
The highest water levels in the region in more than 50 years would leave "a permanent mark", Venice Mayor Luigi Brugnaro tweeted.
"Now the government must listen," he added. "These are the effects of climate change... the costs will be high."
“The average sea level rise predicted by the IPCC, the United Nations body for assessing climate change, is 0.43 metres by the end of the 21st century, and it could be as high as a metre or more. In Venice, higher water levels, adding to the effect of subsidence, are creating new, possibly unsustainable, stresses on the lagoon defences and the city. Already, higher water levels cause rising damp in Venice’s ageing walls, crumbling the bricks and rusting the ties that hold up the buildings. The effect of higher water is also aggravated by lagoon erosion. While the tides took between 90 minutes and two hours to enter a century ago, now they enter in an hour. “
“The results show that RSL in Venice was always rising at an increasingly fast rate.”




tirsdag 26. november 2019

Who are really hysterical and in panic mode about the climate crisis?


Who are really hysterical and in panic mode?

En hyppig tankefeil når det gjelder preventive tiltak er 'forebyggingsparadokset':

Samfunnet ser en kommende fare, gjør tiltak mot den slik at faren ikke rammer oss -eller bare delvis, men senere blir myndighetene likevel anklaget og kritisert for at de handlet til tross for at "ingenting" virkelig skjedde. 

Det er som å bli kritisert for å ha brannforsikring på huset sitt. Og hver dag huset ditt ikke brenner ned har du blitt lurt til å betale forsikringspenger. Og hvem har glemt hysteribeskyldningene mot myndighetene når Røykeloven kom?

Det er mange prominente eksempler; de tydeligste er ozonhullet og skogsdød / sur nedbør.

Disse to potensielle store problemene ble løst gjennom internasjonalt samarbeid uten at folk flest engang fikk det med seg.

Nå bruker uopplyste klimafornektere disse som eksempler på "skremmescenarier som aldri slo til".

Det mest skremmende for klimafornektere er likevel det faktum at internasjonalt samarbeid fungerer og løser problemer -uten at verden blir til en sosialistisk diktaturstat styrt av FN.

Tobakksindustrien brukte nettopp slike svertemetoder for å undergrave vitenskapen som koblet sigarettrøyking til lungekreft. Denne vitenskapen ble kalt alarmist og hysterisk og "dommedagsprofetier.

Hvis internett hadde fantes på 60- 70-tallet ville vel dagens amatør-klima-fornekterne hatt sine egne "Folkeopprøret mot røykehysteriet"-Facebook-grupper der de argumenterte imot skadeeffektene av røyking, viste til anekdotiske eksempler og insisterte på at lungekreft var "naturlig" fordi folk døde av lungekreft før sigaretter ble oppfunnet- mens røykeslutt-kampanjer var en del av en global sammensvergelse fra myndighetene om beskatning og sosioøkonomisk kontroll.

Hvem er de egentlige hysterikerne?

Det er hinsides ironisk når klimafornektere,

fremoverbøyd, blindet og undertrykt av konservativ koko-høyre frykt og angstdrevet paranoid politikk og propaganda

beskylder alle andre for å være "hysterisk".

Som hyler og skriker om at

muslimer skal ta over verden

Som hyler og skriker om at

hvis vi slutter med fossilt brensel vil verdens økonomi kollapse (les: blodpengestrømmen til milliardær-oligarkene).

Som hyler og skriker om at

hvis vi slutter med fossilt brensel blir hele kloden en global diktaturstat styrt av FN?

Som hyler og skriker om dommedag fordi vi tar i bruk noen promille av noen forblåste fjelltopper til vindkraft.

Som hyler og skriker om internasjonale konspirasjonsteorier og at all forskning er korrupt?
(les: truer blodpengestrømmen til milliardær-oligarkene).

Som hyler og skriker om at lyden av vind fører til kreft?

En kan jo ikke gjøre annet enn å le når

borgere i verdens rikeste land er blitt så egoistiske at en får panikk fordi egen livsstil med grådighet,fråtsing og overforbruk kanskje burde jekkes ned et hakk eller to?

En kan jo ikke gjøre annet enn å le når

borgere i verdens rikeste land

blir livredd og desperat fordi en ikke lenger skal få lov til å skylde alle problemer og sitt mislykkede liv på innvandrere, flyktninger, NRK, MDG, myndigheter eller Solen.

Hysteri er når du tilhører et bittelite mindretall av gutteroms-googlere og en livets-skole generasjon av sinte gamle hatefulle menn som må skrike høyt om og om igjen om en internasjonal konspirasjon for å få sin alternative virkelighet til å stemme. Slik som flat earthers, kreasjonister, antivaxxere, chem-trailers og KLIMAFORNEKTERE må.

Klimafornektere er de virkelige dommedagsprofetene:

hyperbolske og paniske frykt-spredere og krisemaksimerere helt adskilt fra vitenskapelig virkelighet.


https://newrepublic.com/article/154014/climate-deniers-hysterical-alarmists

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/tobacco-and-oil-industries-used-same-researchers-to-sway-public1/

Grunnen til at "ingen av dommedagsprofetiene har slått til", er fordi disse ikke finnes. De finnes nok i aviser og ukeblader og i fornekterblogger, men de finnes ikke i den vitenskapelige litteraturen, Vitenskap er konservativ av natur.

Den DUMMESTE og ENESTE dommedagsprofetien jeg har hørt de siste 30 årene er den om at hvis vi slutter med fossil brensel vil verdens økonomi kollapse og alt går til helvete. Hadde no bare klimaadvarsler vært en promille av dommedagsprofetiene til dagens fossil brensel lobby.

Det er hinsides ironisk når klimafornektere,

fremoverbøyd, blindet og undertrykt av konservativ koko-høyre frykt og angstdrevet paranoid politikk og propaganda

beskylder alle andre for å være "hysterisk".

Det er jo hinsides komisk når panikk-kulten kokohøyre skal fortelle verden hvor hysteriske alle andre er.

Hadde no bare "klimahysteriet" vært en promille av desperasjonen, skremmescenariene og dommedagsprofetiene til klimafornektere, fossil brensel-fanatikerne, norske rasister, vindkraft"motstandere", anti-vaxxere og anti-lockdown-sekten.

Hvem er det som egentlig er hysteri og dommedagsprofetene? La oss ta en liten tur gjennom 1900-tallet:

Vitenskapen: blybensin er giftig og en helsefare - Bransjen: nah, det er hysteri

Vitenskapen: Asbest er giftig og en helsefare - Bransjen: nah, det er hysteri

Vitenskapen: DDT er giftig og en helsefare - Bransjen: nah, det er hysteri

Vitenskapen: Teflon er giftig og en helsefare - Bransjen: nah, det er hysteri

Vitenskapen: Kvikksølv er giftig og en helsefare - Bransjen: nah, det er hysteri

Vitenskapen: Smog er giftig og en helsefare - Bransjen: nah, det er hysteri

Vitenskapen: Nikotin er giftig og en helsefare - Bransjen: nah, det er hysteri

Vitenskapen: KFK er ikke bra for ozonlaget - Bransjen: nah, det er hysteri

Vitenskapen: Co2 er og forurensning og helsefare OG forårsaker global oppvarming - Bransjen: nah, det er hysteri

Alle disse industriene nektet for at deres produkt var helsefarlig selv etter at de selv visste det.

Folk som på ramme alvor

tror at muslimer tar over Norge,

tilber rasisme i naziblogger som Resett og Document,

tilber Donald Trump som en messias-skikkelse,

tilber fossil brensel og skriker om at verden går til helvete uten,

tror at de 0,2 % som vindkraft dekker av norges areal "raserer" landet,

sluker konspirasjonsteorier om korona, vaksiner, klimavitenskap, 5G og chemtrails,

støtter fascist-partier som Partiet De Kristne, INP og Alliansen,

er neppe de rette til å kalle noen som helst for hysteriske, "religiøse" eller dommedagsprofeter.

Hysteri er når du tilhører et bittelite mindretall av gutteroms-googlere og en livets-skole generasjon av sinte gamle hatefulle menn som må skrike høyt om og om igjen om en internasjonal konspirasjon for å få sin alternative virkelighet til å stemme. Slik som flat earthers, kreasjonister, antivaxxere, chem-trailers og KLIMAFORNEKTERE må.

Klimafornektere er de virkelige dommedagsprofetene:

hyperbolske og paniske frykt-spredere og krisemaksimerere helt adskilt fra vitenskapelig virkelighet.

Hvis internett hadde fantes på 60- 70-tallet ville vel dagens amatør-klima-fornekterne hatt sine egne "Folkeopprøret mot røykehysteriet"-Facebook-grupper der de argumenterte imot skadeeffektene av røyking, viste til anekdotiske eksempler og insisterte på at lungekreft var "naturlig" fordi folk døde av lungekreft før sigaretter ble oppfunnet- mens røykeslutt-kampanjer var en del av en global sammensvergelse fra myndighetene om beskatning og sosioøkonomisk kontroll.

https://newrepublic.com/article/154014/climate-deniers-hysterical-alarmists



_________________________________________________________________

Who really comes with all the hysterical doomsday prophecies?

After all, it's ironic when those who accuse everyone else of doomsday prophecies themselves are the REALLY hysterical doom mongers.

Who are screaming that

if we end fossil fuels, the world's economy will collapse (read: the blood money flow of the billionaire oligarchs).

Who are screaming that

if we end fossil fuels, the entire globe will become a socialist dictatorship ruled by the UN? (read: less blood money flow to the billionaire oligarchs).

Who cries and screams about international conspiracy theories and all science is corrupt? (Read: because it threatens the blood money flow to billionaire oligarchs).

Who are screaming

the sound of wind is causing cancer?

The other accusations of doom and hysteria otherwise comes from,

selfish people who are bothered just by the thought that they themselves are probably part of the problem.

Who is "shocked" that their own lifestyle of greed and over-consumption must be jacked down a notch or two?

Who is terrified that they will no longer be allowed to blame all problems and their failed lives on immigrants, refugees, black people , "the Left", governments or the Sun?

Who chooses to believe in conspiracy theories to justify their indifference? To please their confirmation biases?

It is beyond ironic when climate deniers,

bent over, blinded and suppressed by conservative wacko and eerie alt-right-fear and anxiety-driven paranoid politics and propaganda

claims the science of climate research is "alarmist" etc.

Oh the irony .....because......

Climate deniers, not climate scientists or activists,

are the true doomsday mongers:

hyperbolic, fear-mongering, and completely divorced from scientific reality..

Scientific evidence, pragmatic reasoning and reasoning for important value choices are the mainstays of liberal democratic society and the Enlightenment tradition.

It is unsustainable and illiberal, a humanitarian mutiny and treacherous , to deny scientific findings that so massively and unequivocally tell us that climate change is one of the greatest - if not the greatest, threat to humanity.

Isn’t it remarkably, every time science is under attack, how its the same corporate polluters, the same individuals, who raises their ugly heads? Every single time?

The same people who have claim the science of global warming is "not settled",

denied the truth of studies linking smoking to lung cancer,

coal smoke to acid rain,

and CFCs to the ozone hole.

What a coincidence ay?

Screaming about "doomsday" is a rhetoric we haven't heard since the tobacco industry used such phrases to smear and fog science and scientists who warned about the health hazards of smoking.

If the internet had been around in the 60s and 70s, climate deniers would be arguing against the health effects of smoking, and dredging up historical/anecdotal examples to insist that lung cancer was "natural" because people died from lung cancer before cigarettes was invented, while warning that smoking cessation efforts were all part of a global conspiracy of taxation and socio-economic control.

https://newrepublic.com/article/154014/climate-deniers-hysterical-alarmists

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/tobacco-and-oil-industries-used-same-researchers-to-sway-public1/

_________________________

Den DUMMESTE og ENESTE dommedagsprofetien jeg har hørt de siste 30 årene er den om at hvis vi slutter med fossil brensel vil verdens økonomi kollapse og alt går til helvete.

Og det ville jo vært ubeleilig for

oligarker, magnater, røverbaroner, fri markedsfundamentalister og en tradisjon bygget på ryggen av imperialisme, kolonialisme, slaveri og hvit overherredømme, som mener at denne velstanden ikke bare var normal, men legitimt tjent?

og det er jo derfor mediekonsernene, tenkesmiene og frontgruppene til

oligarker, magnater, røverbaroner, fri markedsfundamentalister og en tradisjon bygget på ryggen av imperialisme, kolonialisme, slaveri og hvit overherredømme, som mener at denne velstanden ikke bare var normal, men legitimt tjent,

vrir alle nyheter om miljø og klima slik at de ender opp beleilig for

oligarker, magnater, røverbaroner, fri markedsfundamentalister og en tradisjon bygget på ryggen av imperialisme, kolonialisme, slaveri og hvit overherredømme, som mener at denne velstanden ikke bare var normal, men legitimt tjent?












"Hot mess’ paper questioning CO2 and climate change gets retracted

A paper that called into question many central data linking carbon dioxide to the rapidly warming climate has been retracted for “significan...